Current:Home > FinanceAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-16 01:19:01
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (23531)
Related
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Vanderpump Rules’ Brittany Cartwright Files for Divorce From Jax Taylor After 5 Years of Marriage
- Opponents stage protests against Florida state parks development plans pushed by DeSantis
- As NFL's ultimate kickoff X-factor, Cordarrelle Patterson could produce big returns for Steelers
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Sid “Vicious” Eudy, Pro-Wrestling Legend, Dead at 63 After Cancer Battle
- Need a table after moving? Pizza Hut offering free 'moving box table' in select cities
- Video shows Grand Canyon park visitors seek refuge in cave after flash flood erupts
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Starliner astronauts won’t return until 2025: The NASA, Boeing mission explained
Ranking
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- An injured and angry water buffalo is on the loose in Iowa
- Lowe's changes DEI policies in another win for conservative activist
- BMW, Tesla among 743,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
- Mariah Carey Shares Mom Patricia and Sister Alison Recently Died on Same Day
- Minnesota officials vote to tear down dam and bridge that nearly collapsed
- Utah mother and children’s book author Kouri Richins to stand trial in husband’s death, judge says
Recommendation
US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
How a Technology Similar to Fracking Can Store Renewable Energy Underground Without Lithium Batteries
Planned Parenthood challenges Missouri law that kicked area clinics off of Medicaid
A bald eagle was shot in the beak. A care team in Missouri is hopeful it can be saved
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
What Not to Wear’s Stacy London and Clinton Kelly Team Up for New Show After Ending Years-Long Feud
First rioter to enter Capitol during Jan. 6 attack is sentenced to over 4 years in prison
How many points did Caitlin Clark score today? Rookie overcomes injury scare in victory