Current:Home > InvestCharges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time -Wealth Legacy Solutions
Charges against alleged white supremacists are tossed by a California judge for the second time
NovaQuant View
Date:2025-04-11 08:32:31
LOS ANGELES (AP) — For the second time in five years, federal charges against alleged members of a violent white supremacist group accused of inciting violence at California political rallies were dismissed by a federal judge who found they were selectively prosecuted.
Federal prosecutors said members of the Rise Above Movement conspired to riot by using the internet to coordinate traveling to political rallies and attacking demonstrators at gatherings in Huntington Beach, Berkeley and San Bernardino in 2018. The group also posted videos to celebrate violence and recruit members.
U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney first tossed the charges against Robert Rundo and Robert Boman in June 2019. The two were charged with conspiracy to violate the Anti-Riot Act and rioting.
On Wednesday, Carney again granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, agreeing that Rundo and Boman were being selectively prosecuted while “far-left extremist groups” were not.
In his decision, Carney wrote “there seems to be little doubt” that Rundo and Boman, or members of their group, engaged in criminal violence. “But they cannot be selected for prosecution because of their repugnant speech and beliefs over those who committed the same violence with the goal of disrupting political events,” Carney wrote.
Boman was already free on bond, while Rundo was still being detained. Prosecutors requested that Rundo remain in custody pending appeal, but Carney denied it and set him free. Soon after the ruling, prosecutors filed a notice that they would appeal, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Outside the courtroom, Boman became emotional and said he was ashamed of his “old antics,” the Times said.
In his 2019 ruling, Carney said the Anti-Riot Act of 1968 was unconstitutional in part because it criminalized advocating violence when no riot or crime was imminent.
veryGood! (63)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Late-stage cervical cancer cases are on the rise
- Fracking Study Ties Water Contamination to Surface Spills
- GOP Rep. Garret Graves says he's not ruling out a government shutdown after debt ceiling fight
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Why stinky sweat is good for you
- See How Rihanna, Kylie Jenner and More Switched Up Their Met Gala Looks for After-Party Attire
- Kevin Costner and Wife Christine Baumgartner Break Up After 18 Years of Marriage
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- James F. Black
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Selfless by Hyram: Why Women Everywhere Love This Influencer's Skincare Line
- Today’s Climate: May 24, 2010
- Joe Manchin on his political future: Everything's on the table and nothing off the table
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- TSA expands controversial facial recognition program
- Poll: One year after SB 8, Texans express strong support for abortion rights
- How North West Saved Mom Kim Kardashian's Met Gala 2023 Dress
Recommendation
Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
Trump Takes Ax to Science and Other Advisory Committees, Sparking Backlash
Maurice Edwin James “Morey” O’Loughlin
27 Ways Hot Weather Can Kill You — A Dire Warning for a Warming Planet
Tom Holland's New Venture Revealed
States Begin to Comply with Clean Power Plan, Even While Planning to Sue
Poll: One year after SB 8, Texans express strong support for abortion rights
Mothers tell how Pakistan's monsoon floods have upended their lives